-
Jimmy Kimmel has returned in triumph as government censorship finally loses one. His second late night back was even better than his first:
- Was Kimmel suspended for something he said about Charlie Kirk’s murder?
CalicoJack in The Psy of Life wants us to know what he actually said, and why Trump and Trumpers want us to believe something different.
Key actuality:
Kimmel barely even references Kirk’s murder other than to orient his remarks about Trump’s and Maga’s reaction to it. So, what was insensitive and inappropriate about it? For the life of me, I can’t find anything.Key ethical preference:
Some of us think that telling the truth, especially in this age of super sized gaslighting, is important, respectful, educative, and constructive. The truth, no matter how painful to some people, does lead to dialogue in our communities. - driftglass seems to get tired of both-sides journalism, while The New York Times seems to get tired of straight factual coverage as Jimmy Kimmel viewers celebrate a single victory over government censorship.
Key opinion piece headline:
Like His Suspension, Kimmel’s Return Draws a Divided ReactionReally?
- Wisconsin conservative James Wigderson reviews the conservative National Review as they review the strange case of Jimmy Kimmel.
NR makes the case that FCC Chair Brendan Carr, with his threat to put ABC affiliates out of business, is not the problem. It is the existence of the FCC itself.
James isn’t having it. The problem was, and remains, Brendan Carr and the guy he works for.
Key rebuttal:
National Review once understood it’s not the weapon but the person holding it. Our rights under the First Amendment will not be protected until Trump is removed from office. - It isn’t just Jimmy Kimmel who bruises the delicate sensibilities of our current dear leader.
Our favorite Earth-Bound Misfit tells the tale of a completely legal, licensed, paperwork all filled out, permit signed and sealed, statue on the National Mall. The exhibit shows two figures: Trump holding hands with Epstein.
Days before the permit expires, the exhibit disappears, hauled away by authorities.
In protest, Comrade Misfit declares a national holiday:
Every day is now National Make Fun of Donald Trump Day.She offers two new examples.
- SilverAppleQueen makes a worthy point about lifetime experience and freedom of speech.
- In related 1st Amendment news, Trump’s multi-billion dollar lawsuit against The New York Times is scathingly dismissed by a scornful judge.
Journalist Marcy Wheeler at EmptyWheel takes a dive into Trump’s legal submission and shows us why getting mocked in court was justified.
- Trump has transformed the judicial process into a conduit for backdoor bribes. The tactic is to bring weak, often silly, lawsuits destined for immediate dismissal. When other threats are also made (FCC, license cancellation, merger disqualification, breaking government contracts) corporations can make it all disappear with extremely generous pre-trial settlements.
All very legal, all very corrupt.
News Corpse looks at that aspect of the dismissal of the Trump lawsuit against The New York Times. It shows what happens when the subject is not interested in offering an underhanded bribe and actually fights back.
With typical judicial restraint, using more polite words, the judge advised Trump lawyers that, in future litigation, they may want to submit legal arguments that are actually legal and have something to do with the litigation.
- When the FBI was investigating another case, a suspect gave up the name of someone accepting bribes. Agents dutifully set up a sting, and Tom Homan was caught on tape accepting $50,000 from agents disguised as contractors. He promised they would be awarded contracts to build new ICE detention centers. Trump’s Justice Department got the report and promptly cancelled the investigation.
Journalist Arturo Dominguez investigates the money exchange on video as part of a larger scheme involving more, often larger, awards for ICE construction to unknown contractors, followed by mass arrests targeting dissent in order to fill the new centers.
- In Letters from an American, historian Heather Cox Richardson references this from conservative Bill Kristol:
So many coverups.
Release the Epstein files.
Release the Homan tapes.
Release the Venezuelan fishing boats evidence.
— Bill Kristol (@BillKristol) September 22, 2025
She provides what is known about each coverup and the increasing likelihood desperately concealed secrets will tumble into the open.
An additional aspect:
There is another sign today that Trump and his loyalists have outkicked their coverage as they try to consolidate power.We all guessed it:
…after public outcry, Kimmel’s show is back on the air.The same analysis is now available in audio format, as Richardson narrates in podcast.
- In Hackwhackers, the Democrat wins a special Congressional election in Arizona by a stratospheric margin, bringing us closer to prying the Epstein files from Trump’s grubby grasp.
- tengrain at Mock Paper Scissors brings us Trump’s singularly unfortunate day at the United Nations, complete with an escalator conspiracy, a teleprompter breakdown, and a deranged speech.
tengrain brings us a separate summary of the stunningly embarrassing Trump rant.
- Courtesy of Frances Langum, radio and television personality Hal Sparks provides an hilarious rundown of Trumps inept visit to the UK.
- Ian Dunt is a British author, journalist, broadcast personality, columnist, a sort of literary Renaissance man. Here, he offers what seems the universal behind‑the‑scenes international reaction to Trump’s UN ramble:
- At The Onion, Trump signs an executive order making the official language of the U.S. Remedial English. Seems right, after the UN debacle.
- In Canadian satire, The Beaverton reports as the US Ambassador to Canada seeks to improve relations by threatening to tariff, annex, and bomb the northern neighbor if anti-American sentiment doesn’t improve.
- One solid economic advantage that has worked to benefit the US has been advanced technological innovation.
At The Moderate Voice Robert Levine points to an underreported aspect of Trump cutbacks. Slashes to scientific and medical research are already crushing what had been our advantage.
Key competition:
While Trump is reducing federal funding for scientific research, China is expanding its research in all scientific fields in addition to its military.Key question:
You have to wonder where these ideas originate. It’s almost as if President Trump wants to damage the nation, taking it from the most powerful and desirable nation in the world to a middling power. - Regarding future American leadership after Trumpism gets tossed, Jason Linkins responds to extreme caution by urging caution that is more extreme. And he is right.
even if Democrats achieve a trifecta in 2029, the thing I would tell once and future international partners is that the chance we keep pivoting between semi-sanity and outright fascism is high enough that caution needs to be observed; like it or not we are radioactive
— Jason Linkins (@dceiver.bsky.social) September 23, 2025 at 6:03 PM
- Imani Gandy and Jessica Mason Pieklo of Rewire News Group make the case that, with the active assistance of the reconstructed Supreme Court, Trump and his gang are engaged in what compares to the Reconstruction Era – protecting the rights of newly freed slaves after the Civil War. Except that this time, it is Reconstruction in reverse: these two legal experts call it the Deconstruction Era:
It does remind me of long, long ago High School reading about the presidency of Rutherford B. Hayes who, in a deal to get into office, ended protections for those newly freed slaves, launching an era of KKK rule, lynchings, segregation, voting rights denial, and kidnappings under color of law with rental of resulting prisoners to farms, mines, and other businesses.
You may prefer a complete transcript (PDF).
- Brian Beutler proposes a strategic, hopefully temporary, retreat for progressives.
The mid aughts have become a reference point for Dems of many stripes looking for a way forward. It got me thinking about questions I hope everyone on every side of every factional fight will consider with an open mind: What would you sacrifice to be out of this mess? What would you ask of others?
— Brian Beutler (@brianbeutler.bsky.social) September 23, 2025 at 1:05 PM
I recently asked a friend (someone who'd have A LOT on the line) if he'd be willing to revert back to the politics of 2005—when some aspects of American life were more progressive, but most weren't—in order to avoid this brush with fascism. He somewhat reluctantly, said yes. That told me something.
— Brian Beutler (@brianbeutler.bsky.social) September 23, 2025 at 1:10 PM
If you’re uncomfortable imposing sacrifice on others, you’ll appreciate why progressive-minded folks react poorly to knee-jerk moderation. But at some level I think most people in the anti-Trump movement are willing to accept big tradeoffs. And they should. That's how solidarity actually works.
— Brian Beutler (@brianbeutler.bsky.social) September 23, 2025 at 1:21 PM
I hope people sit with this question, and think about it well beyond its implications for them as individuals, in the most expansive possible terms. www.offmessage.net/p/the-democr…
— Brian Beutler (@brianbeutler.bsky.social) September 23, 2025 at 9:44 AM
Depends, I suppose on what compromises we’re talking about. Fortunately, some victories are so ingrained that they are already part of mainstream public mentality.
Still, the Presidency of Rutherford B. Hayes should offer us a cautionary tale.
- Ted McLaughlin at jobsanger has numbers graphed out. Overall and issue by issue, Americans say Trump really sucks.
- The Borowitz Report brings us the latest study linking Trump being president to dramatic increases in the use of Tylenol.
- Master of vituperation Max’s Dad brings a truly magnificent rant (Disclaimer: Your mileage may vary) about this week in MAGAdom and anti-MAGA, including Kimmel triumph, MAGA exploitation of murder, the spectacular Kirk funeral, escalatorgate, Comey, an Oklahoma resignation, beginning with this:
- Tommy Christopher brings clip and transcript as Dan Abrams, interviewed on CNN, expresses surprise at the strange charges against James Comey, that he lied to Congress when he said he had not authorized leaks against Hillary Clinton.
Post authorization?
And by the way, even if you believe McCabe’s account, he’s not saying that Comey knew about the leak before it happened. He’s talking about it after the fact.Key slipshod:
Right, and so she actually had to file this herself. Very unusual that the U.S. Attorney doesn’t have one of the line prosecutors signing off on this, working on this.
She had to literally alter, herself, some of the language in court, which is very unusual and shows you that she’s at this point kind of in this on her own in this U. S. Attorney’s Office. - M. Bouffant at Web of Evil links to more than a dozen sources documenting European warnings to Russia. Russian planes violating NATO member airspace can be shot down.
- Infidel753 captures the week’s major events with his own informed interpretation.
- The Russian incursion into the airspace of Poland and Romania, NATO’s firm response, and Trump’s unexpected agreement.
- The rapture that wasn’t
- The Kimmel suspension that wasn’t (or at least wasn’t long)
- The recognition of a Palestinian state by several major countries.
(Infidel regards it as a betrayal of principle, a reward of the vicious October 7 massacre.)
- My long time valued friend, extremely conservative Darrell Michaels, is back (Yay!) with his own special form of Gish gallop.
From Wikipedia:
The Gish gallop is a rhetorical technique in which a person in a debate attempts to overwhelm an opponent by presenting an excessive number of arguments, without regard for their accuracy or strength, with a rapidity that makes it impossible for the opponent to address them in the time available.Among my friend’s long list of accusations: After the recent horrific murder of Ukrainian immigrant Iryna Zarutska there was an outpouring of support for the murderer.
And this:
The murder of George Floyd was horrific, but the response of millions of people was to destroy, burn, loot, and even kill others because of this – even destroying livelihoods and taking lives of other people of color they were purportedly championing by this rioting.That would be millions. Of rioters. Who were also arsonists. Looters. And murderers (so millions of murders?).
And, of course:
Today we have some people that cheer [sic] and celebrate [sic] the assassination of Charlie Kirk, a good, kind [sic] Christian man because of his politics. They falsely [sic] attribute racism and authoritarianism to him in order to justify their ghoulish behavior. They become far more upset about Jimmy Kimmel losing his job than the assassination of the butt [sic] of his sick [sic] “joke”.Sick.
(Sorry Darrell)My friend is happy that so many among us have repented, now joining in hatred against illegal immigrants (they are all, after all, vicious criminals), no longer celebrating homeless murderers, and turning away – at long last – from cheering for political assassination.
So there is hope for a few of us, after all, when the next rapture comes and goes.
- Meanwhile, in Chicago:
An official Announcement:
DHS is launching Operation Midway Blitz in honor of Katie Abraham who was killed in Illinois by a criminal illegal alien who should have never been in our country. This operation will target the worst of the worst criminal illegal aliens in Chicago
– Assistant Secretary Tricia McLaughlinDisaffected and it Feels So Good documents the arrest of hundreds, including US citizens, who are guilty of having the same skin color as the perpetrator of that horrible crime.
One typical case:
“This is the shortest report I’ve ever seen on anybody,” U.S. Magistrate Judge Keri Holleb Hoatling said, waving his pretrial report in her hand. “He has a criminal history of nothing. … There is no danger that I see to the community whatsoever.” - A couple weeks back, shortly after the Charlie Kirk murder, Dave Dubya decried the assassination, then compared the reactions of right and left when their opposition is targeted with deadly violence.
This week, my conservative friend Darrel Michaels (Yep, that same long time valued extremely conservative friend) comments on Dave’s site, accusing him of a both‑sides‑do‑it argument. Dave, of course, takes off the gloves (surgical gloves, I presume) and performs vivisection on my friend’s argument.
- The Propaganda Professor has a double Bubblegum Crucifix Award this week. Both winners speak adoringly about the saintliness of Charlie Kirk.
- Right Wing Watch brings us extreme right wing author Stephen Wolfe, explaining how the murder of Charlie Kirk brings MAGA folks a wonderful opportunity to crush the left and impose Christian nationalism on the nation:
- North Carolina pastor John Pavlovitz warns those of us in the faith about those who now urge us to embrace a form of Christianity that rejects Jesus
Key identity:
This is who these people are. It is what their churches are celebrating. It’s what drives their adoration of the very kinds of people the namesake of their faith would have the harshest words for.
They are putting their kids in ‘I am Charlie Kirk’ t-shirts and waging empty, hollow culture wars because it’s much easier to do that than to actually read the Sermon on the Mount with them and admit that the love, empathy, generosity, and hospitality of Jesus (things Charlie Kirk and Donald Trump fully reject) is the path their faith tradition calls them to. - Julian Sanchez seems to doubt the Gospel account of the crucifixion:
This is ancillary, but taking the “Biblical accounting” as strictly historical is childishly naive. The gospels progressively contort themselves to exculpate Pilate & Rome for the execution, in ways that eventually become comically implausible.
— Julian Sanchez (@normative.bsky.social) September 23, 2025 at 6:48 PM
If you think a Roman prefect had to be hounded into executing a troublesome street preacher against the prodding of his troubled conscience, or that a crowd of Jews exclaimed “let his blood be upon us” in rehearsed synchrony, I have a bridge in Brooklyn you may be interested in purchasing n
— Julian Sanchez (@normative.bsky.social) September 23, 2025 at 6:53 PM
John has a Jewish Jesus and his Jewish disciples constantly talking about what “the Jews” are doing. If you think that’s an accurate historical account, I don’t know what to tell you, except I hope you develop object permanence soon.
— Julian Sanchez (@normative.bsky.social) September 23, 2025 at 6:58 PM
Shocking though it may be, I express an opinion:
My imperfect take:
Previous incidents of Pilate’s extreme brutality not only terrorized ordinary citizens of Israel, but got an unusual response from Rome. Ruthlessly putting down a rebellion was one thing, but needlessly provoking resistance had to be stopped.
So the message to Pilate from the Emperor is fictional, but captures the tone: The next blood that is spilled in Palestine had better be your own.
Pilate was furious at the increasingly popular preacher. One incident in particular angered him.
Pilate loved demonstrating his dominance. One tactic during the annual Passover festivities was a Roman parade led by Pilate pushing through Jerusalem to show the gathered crowds that they had better bow to Rome. Each annual show of might was an ever bigger and better military celebration of Pilate-rule.
On one Passover, the irritating Jesus led a simultaneous counter-parade from the other side of the city on a donkey with loud cheers from the huge gathering. That was the final straw.
So Pilate coerced the compliant Temple leaders.
That is why I think the quote from Caiaphas is accurate, as he rebuked those who did not want to go along:
“You do not realize that it is better for you that one man die for the people than that the whole nation perish.”
The rest was choreographed so Pilate could plausibly tell Rome that he had no choice but to execute Jesus.And so, two millennia of persecution by Christians against Jews gets a scriptural start.
- PZ Myers prepares us for his disappearance as he prepares for The Rapture.
I suspect the commission of a satire.
- @whiskeywhistle98 reacts to the rapture:
- Dave Columbo discovers he qualifies for the next Rapture, but he still has questions:
- In Happiness Between Tails da-AL posts the last of her series of photos of the fascinating ins and outs of Stavanger, Norway, then hosts blogger, author, poet Sandrael who writes about re-experiencing her deceased mother during a water exercise.
- In Scotties Playtime, Scottie experiences what seems to be serious, and painful, issues but gets by with a compassionate life partner, cats, and food.
An encouraging comment can’t hurt.
- Sarah Cooper has multiple ways to enjoy Rap:
- In Georgia baseball, The Savanna Bananas show us how to take a hit and still celebrate the journey to first base:
The part that defines Trump accurately begins at 5:22 and goes under a minute and a half. Here is my transcript:
So I just don’t like him.
Donald Trump is an old-fashioned ’80s movie style bully, taking your lunch money.
And if you give it to him once, he’ll take it again.
Two things he loves, lunch and money. Okay?
He will take that peanut butter and jelly sandwich your mom cut in half like a triangle for you.
He will gobble it up in front of your face.
And then he’ll eat your little Ziploc bag of Oreos, too.
And he’ll take the note your mother put in your lunchbox and he’ll read it aloud to everyone.
“Oh, look. Mommy wuvs her widdow boy.”
And then he’ll smile with a bunch of cookies in his teeth.
And he’ll grab you by your nipples and he’ll twist them until you have two holes in your Le Tigre shirt because your parents couldn’t afford an Izod.
And he’ll stuff you in a locker and he’ll stomp on your Trapper Keeper and slam the door.
That is Donald Trump. Okay?
He does it to everyone. He did it at the UN yesterday.
Rooting for this bully, I don’t care what side you’re on, it’s like rooting for Biff from Back to the Future.
Literally, Donald Trump was the model for Biff in Back to the Future.
And this is who people are cheering for?
I don’t know about you.
I’m with Marty McFly.
Me too.
More from our guides through the wilderness to internet excellence.
Leave a Reply