-
The best ad of the season so far:
- In Hackwhackers, Trump needs a break from his war, and his Epstein hold‑ups, so he goes to China with high hopes and comes back with pretty much nothing.
I suppose he now needs a new distraction from his China visit which was a distraction from his attack on the Iran thugacracy which was a distraction from a set of files hidden somewhere in the Department of Justice.
- M. Bouffant at Web of Evil goes to the scholarly side and applies the current use of Paper Tiger to Trump’s hyper-inept speech in China.
- Juliet Jeske at Decoding Fox News listened to 22 hours last week and says the network oversold Trump to a point of absurdity:
Anyone tuning into Fox News last week might think the channel had converted to a home shopping network that sold only one product – the glorious leader himself Donald J. Trump.
The president was treated like an overpriced trinket.There was nothing of value Fox hosts could report on anything Trump actually accomplished, so they glowed over variations of this:
“The body language between these two men, I think is excellent,” said Bill Hemmer on Jesse Watters Primetime on Thursday night.Quoting Jesse Watters:
He pulled up to shake hands with Xi. And it was a long shake. 15 seconds. Some friendly patting. Both men stood still. No one leaned in. Who won? Some call it a draw, but Xi did release first. And then Trump hit him with a little pat in the back. Body language experts say that was a power move.Yikes!
More detailed information is presented by Juliet in 52 minutes of entertaining podcast. - The Borowitz Report covers the intense negotiations as Xi and Putin agree to joint ownership of Trump.
- It’s always fun to watch author and educator Amanda Nelson, especially when she gloats. On Tuesday, she gloated over the week that far (Tuesday) for Trump and company:
- Even as a kid, I was a fan of Mark Twain. Hold on, I’m going somewhere with this.
One passage stuck with me from his anti-slavery message-filled The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn. The Widow Douglas takes in young Huck and reprimands him for smoking, a mean practice and wasn’t clean.
And she took snuff, too; of course that was all right, because she done it herself.My blogging friend and occasional mentor Infidel753 continues his spirited, well researched, defense of Israel. In this segment, he presents Bill Maher with one of his trademark New Rule presentations. He attacks the left (which is to say folks like me) for being taken over by a vivid and unreasoning antisemitism.
As with many of his monologues, Bill’s objective is not to argue, but to jeer.
That’s okay with me. Jeering at the opposition can be healthy.
In fact, (ready?)
…of course that’s all right, because I done it myself:I don't like Trump, but I don't mean to denigrate those who do.
And for the people who like Trump, denigrate means "put down"
— burrland01.bsky.social (@burrland01.bsky.social) May 20, 2026 at 7:22 AM
Bill’s primary jeer concerns hypocrisy. He can make a good case for that.
Sadly, he ignores the obvious points that we can, instead, find in the excellent writings of Infidel himself.
Instead, Bill uses two tactics that are hopelessly flawed.
The first is to conflate any and all criticisms of Israel, and specifically of Prime Minister Netanyahu, with hatred of Jews as a group.
Now, it’s everyone’s right in a free country to be antisemitic, but enough with hiding behind Israel or Zionism or Netanyahu.Bill makes a good case for Zionism. The extraordinary hatred against Jews for being Jews is not a passing phenomenon. That hatred justifies a permanent homeland, and Bill correctly shows that with a withering series of examples. I must confess to being more than a bit biased on this. By dictionary definition (I looked it up), I am and always have been a Zionist.
To equate criticism, even harsh criticism, even incorrect criticism, of Israel with antisemitism parallels too closely with long ago attacks on the patriotism of those of us who once opposed the Vietnam War.
And Benjamin Netanyahu? Really?
The other flaw in Bill’s presentation is reflexive whataboutism:
But China, Russia, Sudan, Iran, Myanmar, Haiti, the Congo, North Korea, all way worse.
And that’s how you know it’s antisemitism. It’s the inconsistency.That’s how you know?
That last is partly illustrated with this:
Bill’s standard would tend to disqualify any protest by anyone at any time against any injustice. After all, aren’t there worse cases of oppression in the world?
In fact, circumstance does legitimately elevate some horrors to our immediate attention.
If we are participating, even in the sense of supplying arms, we have a greater interest. And we should.
If emphatic intervention can mitigate suffering and crush oppression, that opportunity can also and should also capture our interest.
Proximity and treaty obligation can be a factor as well.
In the case of Uighurs, active participation by unprincipled American politicians caught my attention years ago.
Although Fair and Unbalanced was hacked into and destroyed by a Moscow based Russian group, I was able to retrieve a few articles, beginning shortly after that site published my first post in 2008, on the oppression of Uighurs by Communist China.
I pointed out the participation in the smear campaign by American politicians mindlessly parroting Communist China’s propaganda against this intensely pro-American group.
It seems Obama had taken an interest in protecting Uighurs fleeing from China’s concentration camps, and some political figures were reflexively anti-Obama. Besides, these refuges were immigrants. Even worse, they were Muslim. That they were more pro-American than most American politicians didn’t matter.
And, to me, that made their defense more necessary.
The bedrock principle was and is as simple and as ancient as this:
Collective guilt against individuals because of an accident of birth is simply wrong.
Bill Maher does briefly, and only briefly, touch on what should be that hardcore first principle:
Now, there are absolutely horrible things said about Muslims, too. That should also be, of course, roundly condemned.The case against antisemitism should flow from that.
It should be more than conflation and whataboutism.If we want thoughtful, carefully researched, informed, and capable defense of Israel, of Netanyahu, of actions against Gaza, of indifference toward Palestinians on the West bank, and the continuation of the war against the brutally theocratic Iranian regime, we must look past Bill Maher’s jeering section.
We cannot rely on the boobocracy of the Trump administration.
We certainly cannot search for wisdom from MAGA folk on social media.For better discussion, for vigorous debate, we must go to more capable and honest minds.
Like Infidel.
- driftglass goes pictorial with how it started (with Bush the lesser) and how it’s going (with Trump).
The pictures are good.
The links help. - At The Moderate Voice Editor Joe Gandelman looks at the tumultuous tenure of Pete Hegseth. His haphazard management and inept personal habits have driven US security and international defense into the ground.
Hegseth has been running our national defense as a continuing series of Fox News diatribes.
- This is entertaining in an alarming sort of way. We could call it the chocolate cake prosecution.
After we hear about Trump’s Department of Justice ordering the IRS to never, not ever, at any time from now to forever, audit Trump’s tax returns, or those of any member of his family, we come to a new bogus prosecution.
This on the heels of a bogus settlement between Trump’s DOJ and Trump his own self awarding $1.776 billion (with a B) to the pro-Trump January 6 insurrectionists. You may remember the lynch mob sending police officers to the hospital while searching the Capitol for Senators and members of Congress to kill. The fund is for the unjust suffering these Capitol tourists endured through prosecution, conviction, and time in prison for what we saw on our televisions.
Journalist Marcy Wheeler at EmptyWheel says there is more.
Remember Judge Aileen Cannon? The judicial Trump sock puppet in robes who kept maneuvering to impede any legal suffering by Trump for stealing and hiding tons and tons of documents?
When Trump was elected and the long delayed (by Judge Cannon) judicial proceeding was dropped, she ordered the investigation report sealed and kept from the public (ready?) ever and ever, from now to forever.
Marcy Wheeler finds that one of the prosecutors is now to be prosecuted by Trump’s DOJ for preserving at least some of the evidence.
DOJ has charged (PDF) former prosecutor, Carmen Mercedes Lineburger, for attempting to liberate documents pertaining to Trump’s theft of government documents.Of what is she accused?
- On September 22, 2025: Saving electronic messages (seemingly not the Jack Smith Report) to a “Chocolate_Cake_Recipe.pdf” file and sending it from her DOJ account to a Hotmail account.
- On December 1, 2025: Renaming the Report itself “Bundt_Cake_Recipe.pdf” and sending it to her Gmail account.
I see nothing in the Wheeler report about anyone ever storing any documents in a locked bathroom. Except, perhaps a faint implication:
…obviously there will be some hilarious selective prosecution issues.Marcy Wheeler speculates on motive and legal consequence. One likelihood:
… there’s the possibility that Lineburger wasn’t trying to convert these documents to her own use at all. It’s possible she was trying to share it, legally, as a whistleblower, with Congress. - North Carolina pastor John Pavlovitz acknowledges that mediocre White men in America are terrified of being replaced. He says they should be.
Here is why:
They’ve watched more and more people gain access to what they’ve been assured all their lives was their sole birthright, and this progress feels like persecution.
And so, rather than leveling up, widening their understanding of the world, or, God forbid, looking in the mirror, they’ve created a new coping narrative that tells them everyone else is the problem. It’s the immigrants. It’s their black and brown neighbors. It’s transgender people. It’s women. It’s Muslims. It’s the Liberals. It’s the media. It’s the ever-present ghost of President Obama residing rent-free in their heads. Convinced that the entire world has conspired against them, they are responding with a steady torrent of emotional outbursts and mindless violence.A better option:
The days when this nation was their participation trophy are coming to an end, and instead of lashing out, they should turn inward. Instead of picking up protest signs and arms, they should try picking up a book. Instead of playing the victim, they should ask themselves why educated, hardworking human beings feel like a threat.
This white fright isn’t unwarranted, but it is misplaced. It isn’t a targeted attack; it’s a self-inflicted wound. There is no coordinated effort to replace unremarkable white men in the United States, but an evolving, increasingly diverse nation is transcending them. - It takes a few sentences for Julian Sanchez to take apart the Alito‑logic adopted by the Supremes in recent voting rights rulings:
It’s a real mystery why we need a bill of rights at all, living as we do in a utopia staffed by conscientious public servants untainted by any whisper of racism, religious prejudice, malice, or desire for personal wealth & power.
— Julian Sanchez (@normative.bsky.social) May 14, 2026 at 4:23 PM
I guess we do still need it to protect that one last uniquely persecuted minority: White heterosexual Christians.
— Julian Sanchez (@normative.bsky.social) May 14, 2026 at 4:25 PM
- Legal expert Imani Gandy and Jessica Mason Pieklo of Rewire News Group call out the Trump administration’s continuing semi-sub rosa campaign to turn all women into traditional wives
Just in case you prefer a complete transcript (PDF)…
- Dave Columbo has an opinion shared by most anyone not in Congress about CongressionalFolk doing a little stock trading on the side (or maybe inside):
- Ted McLaughlin at jobsanger runs down a list of heavy, very heavy instances of insider trading. Not in Congress. All committed by Trump. Personally.
Remember the good old days, when corrupt politicians had the decency to at least try to hide corruption?
- In Canadian satire, The Beaverton covers the Kars4Kids scandal.
Shockingly, the report notes the scandal is not an Epstein thing.
- Wisconsin conservative James Wigderson is presented by a fellow resident and fellow blogger with a proposition: that Republican candidate for Wisconsin governor Tom Tiffany is a nice guy.
James has a hard, very hard, time buying it.
Tiffany voted to overturn the 2020 election, opposed the war with Iran, voted for the war with Iran, loves the Trump tariffs, came out for state tax relief, lobbied against state tax relief, and campaigns for state tax relief.
James notices more:
And don’t get me started on Tiffany’s dislike for immigrants, from scaring Wisconsinites about Afghan refugees to writing (unconstitutional) bills to try to end birthright citizenship. Tiffany is so xenophobic, or thinks the voters are so xenophobic, he even tried to campaign against a Chinese plot to take over Wisconsin’s farms. (China owns less than 1% of the foreign-owned farmland (PDF) in the United States and has no measurable holdings in Wisconsin.)
If we can’t trust Tiffany on the warm bread and butter issues served at the supper club table, and we know from hard experience we can’t trust him on the basic issues of democracy, then why would anyone think he’s a nice guy?Well…
…okay so there is that… - Jess Piper considers this from a rural resident in Nebraska:
I don’t think Republican lawmakers know how angry the people are, or they would be acting and voting differently.
She disagrees:
Republicans can’t win a fair fight, so they change the rules. They redraw the maps — without putting it to a vote. They purge rolls or make it difficult to obtain the IDs needed to vote. They close the polling places or remove mail-in voting. They flood the zone with shit and dare anyone to keep up or fight back.In Rural Missouri and elsewhere, she sees progress:
One example:
A small group of folks from Cameron, Missouri reached out to me four years ago. They were concerned about an extremist church in the town that was attempting to infiltrate the school board to ban books and LGBT references in books.
The group of people who asked me to come speak to them gathered in a church basement in town. The feeling I got while walking down the stairs into the basement was one of dread and fear. These residents weren’t comfortable publicizing their meeting or speaking in public…yet.
I returned to Cameron a few weeks back to speak at a rally for candidates running. I returned to a room that was standing-room-only. Where six local candidates have their name on the ballot. Where not only was the same town hosting us in the light of day, but they advertised it and didn’t have the space to hold all of the folks who came to hear a Democratic message from other rural Democrats.
Cameron, Missouri started with twelve people gathered in a basement to over a hundred in a meeting hall. Progress. Hope. Something concrete to grab a hold of. Something to think about. - News Corpse reports as Trump Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt goes on maternity leave and JD Vance takes her place for a day. The scene becomes comically awful:
He began by assuring the assembled reporters that Trump never said that he didn’t care about people’s financial situations (he did say it), and defending Trump’s stock trading in companies that he has a financial interest in, and condemning fraudulent schemes that sound exactly like what Trump engages in.
And then this:
Vance: "You know who never gets an ounce of sympathy when it comes to disproportionate sentencing? People who vote for Donald Trump and participated in the January 6th protest."
— The Bulwark (@thebulwark.com) May 19, 2026 at 1:35 PM
- Max’s Dad takes a long nauseated look at the new, taxpayer funded (that means you and me), $1.776 billion to reward the January 6 insurrectionists we watched on television as they beat up police and stormed the nation’s Capitol hunting for legislators to lynch.
These people were convicted by juries of regular people, indicted by grand juries of regular people, pleaded guilty to crimes, were sent to prison by Trump appointed judges and went through the legal system that has worked for 250 years. But now? Thes criminals are “patriots”, the violent are “tourists”, Trump is a god, and the 2020 election was not legit (even though Republican senators were all reelected and Republican House members-maintained control).
Iran Contra, Watergate, Teapot Dome, Boss Tweed and the Iran War were all scandals that pale in comparison to THIS blatant corruption. - In Letters from an American, historian Heather Cox Richardson has more on the financial bonus for the January 6 mob Trump sent to get tough with Congress.
She has details on one legal challenge by police officers the mob attacked, with resulting injuries and deaths. And there is a little resistance from Democrats and enough Republican Senate and Congressional members of Congress to pose serious problems.
She quotes from that suit as she reviews some of what actually happened that violent day, and why some of the insurrectionists were later charged.
The same analysis is now available in audio format, as Richardson narrates in podcast.
- tengrain at Mock Paper Scissors begins with House Republicans backing the payoff financed by taxpayers:
🚨BREAKING: Republicans just voted AGAINST my amendment to stop Trump's $1.8 billion slush fund from bailing out the convicted felons who assaulted cops on January 6th.
You read that right. They blocked us from even debating the issue on the House floor.
Beyond shameful.
— Rep. Jim McGovern (@repmcgovern.bsky.social) May 19, 2026 at 4:17 PM
tengrain discovers an upside in ballots and courtrooms.
As if to emphasize that, Trumpers go all out to defend the slush fund.
One of several notable examples:US attorney for SDNY Jay Clayton defends Trump's taxpayer-funded J6 slush fund: "I don't think we're gonna be talking about this issue in a week because the American people are gonna say, 'Look, they leaked his tax returns, they tried to destroy him. Okay, we resolved that.'"
— Aaron Rupar (@atrupar.com) May 21, 2026 at 7:09 AM
- Tommy Christopher brings us former officer Mike Fanone, who was among those defending the nation’s Capitol that January 6, interviewed by Jim Acosta
Former DC Metro cop Michael Fanone was stunned when Jim Acosta dug up a video receipt on President Donald Trump that hits hard amid the controversy over Trump’s $1.776 billion slush fund.
This is Trump shortly after that riot, trying hard to distance himself from the lynch mob he sent to storm Congress:
Right or on the left, a Democrat or a Republican, there is never a justification for violence. No excuses, no exceptions.
America is a nation of laws. Those who engaged in the attacks last week will be brought to justice.Trump’s throwing under the bus the criminal insurrectionists who had operated at his direction and Officer Fanone’s amazed reaction begin at about the 2‑minute mark:
- Brian Beutler points to media extreme balance over truth when it comes to Trump’s make-insurrectionists-rich slush fund.
If Trump sued his own government for $2.0T, settled with himself for $1.5T, then refused to participate in the appropriations process and “funded” whichever “government” programs he likes best from that pile of stolen cash, the Times would still be like “Trump tests unorthodox budgeting method.”
— Brian Beutler (@brianbeutler.bsky.social) May 20, 2026 at 4:52 PM
- Jason Linkins sees today’s sloshy sort of every-side-is-equally-valid journalism as itself invalid.
don't need "could" here this is the stated intention behind this slush fund
— Jason Linkins (@dceiver.bsky.social) May 18, 2026 at 11:23 AM
really should at least make it crystal clear that the "critics" in this case are objectively correct, "political slush fund" is a term you can define on its own
— Jason Linkins (@dceiver.bsky.social) May 18, 2026 at 11:23 AM
He goes to the publication for which he writes and humbly offers a better way:
🎵 This is how you do it 🎵
newrepublic.com/post/210561/…
— Jason Linkins (@dceiver.bsky.social) May 18, 2026 at 11:23 AM
Okay, maybe not so humble.
- Trump and his MAGAFolk followers have, for a long time, wanted to end automatic citizenship for those born in the United States. They keep stumbling into the 14th Amendment that plainly says they are wrong.
Our favorite Earth-Bound Misfit notices another tripwire in the 14th.
Trump is negotiating with
himselfthe Treasury Department he controls. He wants millions of dollars to go to January 6 insurgents who stormed the Capitol in 2001, beating police officers bloody, hunting for legislators to kill.One variation on the idea that they were completely innocent is they were just peaceably assembling to visit the building as tourists. Whatever the reasoning, they are said by Trump to have been unjustly persecuted by the American justice system.
So they are deserving of compensation for all their trouble after their lynch mob tried to kill any legislators they could find…
But it seems Section 4 of the 14th is a largely unreported roadblock.
- Dave Dubya takes on the recurrent theme from the extreme right, which is to say Christian Nationalists, that America was founded as a Christian nation. Dave resorts to history, to documentation, to the founders in exposing the lie.
Mike John, Republican Speaker of the House of Representatives:
They want to erase the history of America and pretend as if we’re not a nation that was dedicated originally to God… The people who are the naysayers and who have created this new term of ‘Christian nationalism’ as a pejorative, a derogatory term, are trying to silence the influence and the voices of Christians, and I think that’s wildly inappropriate.James Madison, American founder, 1819:
The civil government functions with complete success by the total separation of the Church from the State. - Right Wing Watch takes us to the latest violation of the 1st Amendment, the Taxpayer funded Rededication of the United States to God rally this week, which turned out to largely worshipful of Trump.
Sadly, the object of their worship was not himself able to attend, drawn as Trump was to playing golf instead.
It can be tough to lose a competition, but fair is fair. Golf wins again.
- The Propaganda Professor presents his weekly Bubblegum Crucifix Award to former Muslim, now Christian, Shahriq Khan who has a new theory on why God is bringing Muslim immigrants to America.
- Discovery Institute is an organization of creationists demanding that Intelligent Design be taught in school as an alternative to evolution.
PZ Myers takes a look at complaints from creationists at Discovery Institute that scientists are too darn smug.
- In Scotties Playtime Ali Redford brings three short videos (the longest is 1 minute) promoting fun, joy, and love.
- An autistic child has a meltdown over not completing a card in time for a housewarming. CalicoJack in The Psy of Life goes to his personal history with social groups to explain for us how small infractions can explode internally during attempts to navigate unspoken rules of group interaction.
As I see it, complete understanding of another’s lifetime experience is not possible. Still, we try.
Empathy and help can come from the slightest insights.
Jack guides us with each small glimpse. - In Happiness Between Tails, da-AL’s guest is author Aithal, who explains the trend in books of fiction toward brevity. The public is going to shorter books and writers are adapting with shorter works.
- At The Onion, a major bank reminds customers to only share their banking information with people who seem nice.
- Dave Barry goes gender warring, as he compares issues carried by men and those carried by women (mostly).
After a
confrontationfriendly nonconfrontational discussion with his wife, Dave goes entirely hypothetical, beginning with an acknowledgment on behalf of those of us of the male persuasion:Men are not perfect. As a lifelong man, I understand this. We men have flaws, which women have been helpfully pointing out to us for thousands of years. For example my wife, Michelle, a woman, often observes that whereas women almost always resolve their disputes nonviolently, men tend to be be aggressive macho idiots who wind up getting into pointless fistfights, or seizing the Strait of Hormuz.
Fair enough. Although this is not true of ALL men. I may have done some foolish things in my life, but I have never seized the Strait of Hormuz, except that one time in college, and most of those charges were dropped.Then he goes entirely hypothetical with a completely imaginary female type person his wife may recognize from some sort of uh classic literary fiction.
Okay, he then caves to conflict avoidance and focuses on male issues, mostly concerning zippers.
- SilverAppleQueen reports that the cold snap seems over, rain and drizzle are gone, the outside is warm and sunny, and she has beautiful cats, who still want to stay in and snooze.
- The Savanna Bananas teach us how to constructively brawl
- @whiskeywhistle98 remembers. And so do we:
More wisdom from our usual suspects:















Leave a Reply